[31, 32] Orwin’s Nfs determines the number of additional studies

[31, 32] Orwin’s Nfs determines the number of additional studies in a meta-analysis yielding null effect sizes that would be needed to

yield a “trivial” OR of 1.05. Researchers suggest that meta-analysts calculate a tolerance level around a fail-safe N that is equal to 5 times the number of effects included in the meta-analysis plus 10 (the “5k + 10” benchmark).[32, 33] Moreover, the association between the standardized effect sizes and the variances of these effects was analyzed by rank correlation with use of the Kendall tau method. If small studies with negative results were less likely to be published, the correlation between variance and effect size CCI-779 price would be high. Conversely, a lack of a significant correlation can be interpreted as the absence of publication bias.[34] After the removal of duplicates, a list of 137 potentially eligible studies was generated (Fig. 1). Based on titles and abstracts, 57 articles were excluded at the

first screening because they were qualitative studies, reviews or commentaries, or studies that did not measure school bullying. Seven studies35-41 were not available in full text. Full-text copies of the remaining 73 potentially relevant studies were obtained. Thirty-seven studies were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria (eg, they did not have a control group). Fifteen studies did not report enough data to compute effect sizes or confidence intervals. As a result, the remaining 20 studies were included for this meta-analysis. Inhibitor Library Celecoxib Three studies were longitudinal studies, and 17 employed a cross-sectional design. The Table

summarizes the characteristics of the studies included in this meta-analysis, including sample-size and response rate, age and gender composition of the sample, type of measures, study design, and type of sampling. A total of 173,775 children and adolescents participated in the 20 studies. Across the 17 studies that provided information about the sample’s gender composition, 51.3% (range: 32.8-62.4%) of the participants were girls. Fourteen studies reported data on the prevalence of headache, which was on average 32.7% (range: 9.1-71.7%) in the bullied group and 19.1% (range: 5.3-46.1%) in the control group. Five studies were from Norway,42-45 2 of which were from the same publication; 2 respectively from India,[46, 47] the Netherlands,[48, 49] Turkey,[50, 51] and the United States;[52, 53] and 1 respectively from China,[54] Finland,[44] Greenland,[55] Italy,[56] the United Kingdom,[57] and Russia.[58] One article reported data from multiple countries.[18] Information about race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) of the participants was not systematically reported in all studies.

Comments are closed.