Our results also seemed to support this hypothesis since both hig

Our results also seemed to support this hypothesis since both high bacterial production and specific bands were only observed in treatments VF and VFA. Stimulation of viral production was much more variable AC220 between lakes than between seasons and it was clearly higher in Lake Bourget. This suggests that environmental conditions encountered in the mesotrophic system might promote higher viral activity compared to more oligotrophic conditions. This hypothesis agrees with Lymer et al. [34] or Pradeep and Sime-Ngando [26] who observed, during a microcosm experiment, an enhancement of both viral abundance and FIC (frequency of infected cells) in P-enriched

samples as a result of nutrient stimulation of bacterial growth, which in turn enhanced viral activity. However, it is noteworthy

here that although Nirogacestat mouse phosphorus concentration was 2-fold higher in Lake Bourget than in Lake Annecy (Table 1), no significant difference was recorded in bacterial production between the two lakes (t test, P > 0.005). Some studies have suggested that nutrient availability may have an important influence on viral life strategies (e.g. [35, 36]). As lysogenic infection is considered the most favourable method of bacterial infection in water characterized by low bacterial abundance and primary production, this may also explain the relatively weak stimulation of viral production observed in Lake Annecy compared to Lake Bourget [32]. In Lake Annecy, and in contrast selleck inhibitor to viral production, the effects of flagellate presence on viral abundance seemed to be highly variable between the two periods (LA1 vs. LA2). This

variation revealed viral abundance stimulation in early-spring (LA1) and repression Plasmin in summer (LA2), for both treatments (VFA and VF). This result could suggest a direct grazing of flagellates on viruses during summer. Virivory by flagellates has been previously reported [37, 38] and according to Domaizon et al. [39], all flagellates do not act similarly because of large differences between taxon-specifc ingestion rates. During our study, heterotrophic flagellates were mainly represented by Oikomonas (45 and 48% during LA1 and LA2, respectively). Also, the grazing impact of flagellates on viruses has always been reported to be relatively low, resulting in < 4% loss [37, 38]. Hence, direct grazing of flagellates on viruses was unlikely to explain the repression of viral abundance in LA2. Other factors should be invoked [36] and would need further investigation. Effect of both flagellates and viruses on bacterial activity Higher bacterial production in both VF and VFA treatments than V suggested that grazers and viruses acted additively to sustain (directly or indirectly) bacterial activity in Lake Annecy and Lake Bourget.

Comments are closed.