CD4+ T cells were depleted AZD0530 solubility dmso from PBMCs and the frequency of LAP (TGF-β1)-producing cells per 1·5 × 105 cells was determined using an ELISPOT assay. The results demonstrate that over 50% of GPC81–95-induced LAP (TGF-β1)-producing cells were CD4+ T cells (Fig. 1d; 210 responders per 1·5 × 105 total PBMCs versus 99 responders per 1·5 × 105 CD3+-depleted PBMCs). Given the important

role that CD4+ T cells play in modulating an immune response, we focused this study primarily on the effects of GPC81–95 on CD4+ T cells. The percentages of LAP (TGF-β1)+ CD4+ T cells in PBMCs of donors 1–4 after stimulation with GPC81–95 are shown using flow cytometry (Fig. 2a). The release of LAP (TGF-β1) was also analysed in the PBMCs of donors 5–8 (Fig. 2b). The results demonstrate that all the individuals tested in this experiment responded to GPC81–95 peptide but not an irrelevant peptide (AFP365–373) and expressed LAP (TGF-β1). To clarify whether

or not the responsive CD4+ LAP (TGF-β1)+ fraction corresponds to the FoxP3+ regulatory T-cell population, GPC81–95-stimulated CD4 T cells were co-stained for intracellular Foxp3 and membrane-bound LAP (TGF-β1). The results demonstrate that the reacting CD4+ T cells do not express Foxp3 (Fig. 2c). To examine whether GPC81–95 can directly stimulate CD4+ T cells, we performed two sets of experiments. The ability of GPC81–95 to stimulate LAP (TGF-β1) was demonstrated c-Met inhibitor in purified primary CD4+ T cells (95% purity as determined by FACS) and Jurkat CD4+ T cells (data not shown). We used several

approaches to confirm that GPC81–95 has click here intrinsic ability to induce LAP (TGF-β1) on CD4+ T cells. First, we demonstrated that alanine substitution at positions 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 (alanine to serine), 86, 87, 88, 89, 92, 93 and 94 reduce the ability of GPC81–95 to stimulate LAP (TGF-β1) (Fig. 3a). This result suggests that the biological activity of the GPC81–95 depends on its amino acid composition. Second, we observed that GPC81–95 peptide with higher purity (> 90%) induced higher percentages of LAP (TGF-β1) expression than the lower purity peptide (70%) (data not shown), suggesting that non-GPC81–95 peptide derivatives produced during peptide synthesis (shorter peptides, peptides with amino acid deletions or substitutions) are not the bioactive components. We also found that none of the truncated 10-mer peptides or the reversed form of GPC81–95 (SQLLQEMNLRATLQY) induced LAP (TGF-β1) (Fig. 3b,c), indicating that the biological activity of the GPC81–95 also depends on its length. To confirm that the GPC81–95-induced LAP (TGF-β1) expression on CD4+ T cells is not the result of contamination with TLR ligands, we tested commercially available TLR1–9 ligands in a broad range of concentrations. None of these treatments had the ability to induce LAP (TGF-β1) expression (Fig. 3d).